why aren't the sanctions on Iran enough for regime change?
By Arash Nikzad
The new sanctions on Iran are considered as an important and vital step in the right direction but they must be coupled with a whole new policy on the Iranian Regime, too.
Alireza Jafarzadeh, the deputy director of the Washington office of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, wrote an op-ed on Fox News in which he welcomed the US sanctions against the Iranian Regime but advised the government to also support the Iranian people’s resistance.
He wrote: “These pressures will make a profound difference in the future of Iran if coupled with reaching out to the people of Iran and their organized opposition. They will succeed in diminishing the power and influence of the notorious IRGC; bolster the Iranian people and the prospect of the emergence of a truly democratic Iranian government.”
Two years after the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA/ Iran nuclear deal), Jafarzadeh argued that the nuclear deal has- at best- only had a limited impact on Iran’s development of nuclear weapons and if the Regime refuses to allow international inspections of their facilities, then how can we be sure that it has had any impact at all?
He wrote: “In addition, in areas unrelated to the nuclear agreement, the Iranian regime’s behavior has only gotten worse over the past two years.”
He praised the US for ramping up non-nuclear sanctions against the Regime for its support of terrorism, human rights violations, and its ballistic missile program and for its debate over designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist entity.
He wrote: “This is a meaningful start to a new Iran policy that is comprehensive in its aims and in its enforcement. Toward that end, the US should work with the UN and EU to evict the IRCG from the combat zones in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. This will help protect the West and its allies, as well as empower the Iranian people, who are seeking regime change and are more than capable of bringing it about on their own.”
The Iranian Regime is increasingly reviled by its own people and if the international community really wants to stop the destructive behavior of the Regime, they should support the people.
He wrote: “The Iranian regime must be more isolated and economically handicapped by the United States. It must also be subject to pressure not just over its nuclear program but also over a range of current and past crimes, including illicit missile testing, escalating regional and sectarian conflicts in the Middle East, and the 1988 massacre of political prisoners.”
The new sanctions on Iran are considered as an important and vital step in the right direction but they must be coupled with a whole new policy on the Iranian Regime, too.
Alireza Jafarzadeh, the deputy director of the Washington office of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, wrote an op-ed on Fox News in which he welcomed the US sanctions against the Iranian Regime but advised the government to also support the Iranian people’s resistance.
He wrote: “These pressures will make a profound difference in the future of Iran if coupled with reaching out to the people of Iran and their organized opposition. They will succeed in diminishing the power and influence of the notorious IRGC; bolster the Iranian people and the prospect of the emergence of a truly democratic Iranian government.”
Two years after the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA/ Iran nuclear deal), Jafarzadeh argued that the nuclear deal has- at best- only had a limited impact on Iran’s development of nuclear weapons and if the Regime refuses to allow international inspections of their facilities, then how can we be sure that it has had any impact at all?
He wrote: “In addition, in areas unrelated to the nuclear agreement, the Iranian regime’s behavior has only gotten worse over the past two years.”
He praised the US for ramping up non-nuclear sanctions against the Regime for its support of terrorism, human rights violations, and its ballistic missile program and for its debate over designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist entity.
He wrote: “This is a meaningful start to a new Iran policy that is comprehensive in its aims and in its enforcement. Toward that end, the US should work with the UN and EU to evict the IRCG from the combat zones in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. This will help protect the West and its allies, as well as empower the Iranian people, who are seeking regime change and are more than capable of bringing it about on their own.”
The Iranian Regime is increasingly reviled by its own people and if the international community really wants to stop the destructive behavior of the Regime, they should support the people.
He wrote: “The Iranian regime must be more isolated and economically handicapped by the United States. It must also be subject to pressure not just over its nuclear program but also over a range of current and past crimes, including illicit missile testing, escalating regional and sectarian conflicts in the Middle East, and the 1988 massacre of political prisoners.”
Comments
Post a Comment